Running for Your Life: Politics and the Past

So Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is quoted as saying the president is “just not worth” the effort that impeachment proceedings would entail.

Okay, well that is enlightening.

It is discouraging, isn’t it, the current political theater?

Take the current debate on immigration. Let’s just enter a reporter’s mindset for a moment and say, hey, maybe there is something to the story … . Rather than be comfortable with the he said, she said fight of middle school playground bravado, consider the account of a solid reporter like Mattathias Schwartz, who wrote “The Human Wall” cover story for New York magazine, Jan. 7-20, 2019.


Or here’s something I encountered that’s, well, a little more “past” than January 2019, in terms of keeping the fire to the feet of what looks like a compromised political leader:

“All acts of the party – all things that explain or throw light on these acts, -- all the acts of others relative to the affair, that come to his knowledge, and may influence him, -- his friendships and enmities, his promises, his threats, the truth of his discourse, the falsehood of his apologies, pretences, and explanations, his looks, his speech, his silence where he was called on to speak, everything which tends to establish the connection between all these particulars, -- every circumstance, precedent, concomitant, and subsequent, become parts of circumstantial evidence.”

This from Edmund Burke’s 1794 report for Britain’s House of Commons on the impeachment of Warren Hastings, the governor-general of Bengal.

If only, right?

Next: Running for Your Life: March Mood