Running for Your Life: Liberals Dead Tired of Hillary II

Welcome to the second in a series of arguments of just why Liberals Are, yes, Dead Tired of Hillary!

Three blogposts ago, you’ll find the first in the series. That argument gave the domestic political reasoning of why Liberals Are Dead Tired of Hillary.

For the foreign political reasoning, I give you the highlights of a crystal-clear damning of Saint Hillary (aka, Deleter of the Free World, Post cover, March 11) distilled from a review of two books, Hard Choices by Hillary Clinton, and HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton, by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, written by Jackson Lears in the Feb. 5 edition of the London Review of Books.

To wit:

  • Despite [the differing styles of the Bush and Clinton candidacies], the intent is the same: rewarding friends and punishing enemies, the latter with such precision that one of her staffers fears Hillary will come to seem little different from “Nixon in a pantsuit.”

  • Exceptionalists (as in, America must honor its unique responsibility for global leadership) like Clinton are unable to conceive of a multipolar world where some nations might prefer to go their own way.

  • While she admits she “got it wrong” in voting for the invasion of Iraq, she shows no sign of having learned from her mistake … Clinton’s courtship of [General David Petraeus] reveals a deeper amnesia. Like most Washington policymakers, she has forgotten the failure of counterinsurgency in Vietnam.

  • The exceptionalist outlook transcends party ideology; it is embraced by the Clintons, the Bushes and the entire Washington establishment. We badly need a public debate that challenges this consensus. But we are unlikely to have it, given the widespread assumption that Hillary Clinton is the only alternative to the all too real nightmare of Republican rule. (From a letter written in reply to a reader, March 19 edition)


Next: Running for Your Life: Finally, Outside Again !