Running for Your Life: Stop Talking About 2016, For Crying Out Loud

Okay, so I’ve been reading this book-length reportage by Luke Harding called “A Very Expensive Poison: The Assassination of Alexander Litvinenko and Putin’s War With the West,” and it’s got me to thinking about our menacing moment in the social and political life here in the United States.

Say, I were a member of the national security team seeking to protect the president – and our very democracy – from harm.

I would be building out defense strategies upon an imagined scenario, to wit:

That Russian agents, similar to those who traveled to London and killed Putin foe Litvinenko, were to target our president with a deadly poison, and then in the aftermath, set murder evidence traps that lead to those Democrats who have called for severe censure, if not removal, of the head of our country.

Republicans, who have to date shown zero interest in demanding thorough investigations in matters that would threaten their purchase on power, would be willing dupes to this scenario.

If the objective in the "War With the West" is to destabilizing a democracy in the most devastating way, what better plan than this? Just try to imagine the repercussions of such an attack.

The threat is before us, not behind us. Isn’t it time to start to get ahead of this story?

Running for Your Life: Notes from “The Long Run”

Running for Your Life: Mueller Muddle

We are asking the wrong question, our heads in the sand.

A group organized by Russian “KGB” moles “influenced” the 2016 US Election to such a degree as to tilt the result to one candidate, Donald Trump.

We shorthand this fact to say we must double-down to expose “Russian” propaganda on social media (see previous blog post).

Horrors! Millions have been infected by the “fake news” perpetrated by those forces of evil.

Not. Consider that our spiritual founding father (the other guys being slave owner, philosopher-types, notwithstanding), PT Barnum, and the phrase closely associated with him:

“There is a sucker born every minute.”

The question is, How did our society get to such a depraved state in which the Barnum line supplants our founding fathers' “Out of many, one,” or E pluribus unum?

Next: Stop Talking About 2016, For Crying Out Loud

Running for Your Life: Notre Dame Mood

There is a power, a soul, that one feels in sacred spaces. What Yeats writes in “Prayer for My Daughter”: To be “rooted in one dear perpetual place.” Why tears flowed when Notre Dame was burning, when the first images came into view.

Just before M and I left for a visit to Paris last October, I found a book on the street. Judging from its condition, “Notre Dame of Paris” by Allan Temko (1924-2006), published by Time Inc. in 1952, had spent a lot of time in someone’s basement. It’s brittle cover sheered off in my hand when I cracked the book open. There is still a musty smell to it.

But Temko, whose ardor for the cathedral never lags, thrilled me with his writing, a portion of which is excerpted  below.  In fact, it reminded me of John Ruskin’s “Stones of Venice.”

During these days of pain and loss in the aftermath of the fire’s damage, find and buy a copy of Temko’s book. There is so much to admire here, so much for those in need of healing following this painful event, to wit:

“The first Parisians settled in the Ile de France, bringing with them their gods and their arts, for the two were inseparable. On a bend in the Seine they found an island naturally suited for defense, with a low hill on its eastern point; and since the summits of the hills were sacred, they built a temple of branches and leaves at the crest and installed their gods on Ile-de-la-Cite. Paris then could not have look anything like Paris today, but the gods bear some resemblance.

Men adored a stone, a spring, a green tree. They sacrificed to the sun and the moon and to the brighter stars. They dedicated altars to beasts and reptiles and various birds – to the hawk, the serpent, the hound and the bear. They worshipped a powerful wind which sometimes swept over the uncultivated fields. There was a god in the white waterfall, in the solemn lakes, in every well, in caverns, or where paths met, on hilltops. The gods were numerous, fierce, jealous, and as complicated or uncomplicated as the humans who enshrined them; but among the gods was a mother deity, a neolithic madonna who occasionally held a child in her arms, and both mother and child have had a certain following in France to this day.”

Next: Running for Your Life: Notes from “The Long Run”

Running for Your Life: "Media" and the Election

OK, like it or not, the run-up to the great US Vote is in full swing.

Everyone is staking out a position.

Here's one as a career journalist, a survivor in the media profession. Back when "media" hadn't been drained of its meaning. Before the juggernaut of social "media" revolutionized the way people consume news:

I would like to be a part of an interest group that would support a candidate who would pledge to only discuss matters relating to social media by agreeing to acknowledge the bastardization of the term "media" to describe what constitutes what most people read, share and endlessly talk about.

I would support the first presidential candidate -- from any party, or independent -- who would, when talking about what people call "social media," rephrase it to say "social propaganda."

That train may have left the station. But with all the non-news about to find its way into people's brains and run throughout their conversation over the next many months (10 months till the Iowa Caucus!), I see it as the kind of noble, moral step that the right candidate would get behind.

Next: Running for Your Life: Pittsburgh 2019


Running for Your Life: The News

Here’s a gruesome thought that bears repeating.:

When news is boiled down to the tao of profits or what accounts for the explanation of events in an unprincipled state like Russia, the end result is propaganda.

Money paves the race to the bottom; a sad loser-strewn skid row is the route to the top.

Does news that’s regulated by a “fairness doctrine” find any traction?

Or have the competing sides polluted, drained the merit out of the nonpartisan objective of news as an objective vehicle in the never-ending quest for a secular truth?

Perhaps Clive James said it best in his book, “Cultural Amnesia:”

“Truly unprincipled states never blush.”

Next: Running for Your Life: Twenty-Plus Miler