Running for Your Life: Straight Talk

You can straight talk all you want but when compromise is treason you won’t be changing any hearts and minds.

Which, of course, goes to the essence of the pathetic rhetoric of modern warfare, that by displaying our immortal truth of American exceptionalism, we, as a people, can declare with apparent certainty that we are in the business of changing hearts and minds. (See: Bush/Cheney war on Iraq; subset: search for weapons of mass destruction.)

No, straight talk (consider a newspaper column named Fist Amendment) is only good as a sermon to the converted. The best you can do is conceive the smartest damn sermon on a topic (say, climate change, #MeToo, Trump/Russia) and deliver it to the faithful. Let ’em cheer, fall over themselves in appreciative agreement and then take the message to the street. Hallelujah?

Problem is straight talk is not truth. (Regardless of what a blue blood newspaper says in its promotional advertising.)

President Trump’s fixer, Michael Cohen, delivers straight talk, and the myriad “churches” in America write sermons on a particle of truth in what he says (or doesn’t say but implies) that excites the faithful in what seems an infinite number of ways.

No matter, get on with your straight talk. The internet will take care of it. Consider this quote from Patricia Lockwood in the Feb. 21, 2019, edition of the London Review of Books. (I couldn’t say it any better …)

“A few years ago when it suddenly occurred to us that the internet was a place we could never leave, I began to keep a diary of what it felt like to be there in the days of its snowy white disintegration, which felt also like the disintegration of my own mind.”

Next: Running for Your Life: Eighteen Miler Ahead!